Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Cassetti, Mario
Дата выпуска 1995
dc.description This paper suggests a new algorithm for selecting the input–output (IO) coefficients of a Leontief matrix in order of importance, so providing an analytical method for decomposing an IO matrix. It avoids the choice of arbitrary thresholds for eliminating flows or coefficients, and allows for circular relationships. For this purpose, a simple inverse-important criterion has been chosen, which is consistent with the logic of the Leontief model. A procedure that greatly reduces the computational burden is then devised. This method permits new comparisons of IO structures of different countries or regions, for identifying their different degree of internal integration and their reciprocal influence through the exchange of intermediate goods. An application to an IO model for seven European Community countries for 1980 is then presented.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель Carfax Publishing Company
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема Production structure
Тема qualitative input–output analysis
Тема comparative analysis of economic systems
Тема European Community
Название A New Method for the Identification of Patterns in Input–Output Matrices
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/09535319500000002
Electronic ISSN 1469-5758
Print ISSN 0953-5314
Журнал Economic Systems Research
Том 7
Первая страница 363
Последняя страница 382
Аффилиация Cassetti, Mario; Dipartimento di Scienze Economiche, Università di Brescia
Выпуск 4
Библиографическая ссылка Chenery, H. B. and Watanabe, T. 1958. International comparisons of the structure of production. conometrica, 4: 487–521.
Библиографическая ссылка Chenery, H., Robinson, S. and Syrquin, M., eds. 1986. Industrialization and Growth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Deutsch, J. and Syrquin, M. 1989. Economic development and the structure of production. Economic Systems Research, 4: 447–464.
Библиографическая ссылка Dietzenbacher, E., van der Linden, J. A. and Steenge, A. E. 1993. The regional extraction method: EC input—output comparisons. Economic Systems Research, 2: 185–206.
Библиографическая ссылка Gazon, J. 1976. “Transmission de l'influence economique. Un approche structurale”. In Collection de PIME, Vol. 13, Paris: Sirey.
Библиографическая ссылка Gazon, J. 1989. Analyse de l'interdépendance, industrielle par la methodologie structurale. Economie Appliquee, 4: 133–163.
Библиографическая ссылка Haltia, O. 1992. A triangularization algorithm without ringshift permutation. Economic Systems Research, 3: 223–234.
Библиографическая ссылка Harary, F., Norman, R. Z. and Cartwright, D. 1968. Introduction a la Théorie des Graphes Orientès, Paris: Dunod.
Библиографическая ссылка Helmstädter, E. 1969. “The hierarchical structure of interindustrial transactions”. In International Comparison of Inter-Industry Data, Industrial Planning and Programming Series Vol. 2, New York: United Nations.
Библиографическая ссылка Hewings, G. J. D. 1984. The role of prior information in updating regional input–output models. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 18: 319–336.
Библиографическая ссылка Hewings, G. J. D., Fonseca, M., Guilhuto, J. and Sonis, M. 1989. Key sectors and structural change in the Brazilian economy: a comparison of alternative approaches and their policy implications. Journal of Policy Modeling, 1: 66–90.
Библиографическая ссылка Hewings, G. J. D., Jensen, R. C., West, G. R., Sonis, M. and Jackson, R. W. 1989b. The spatial organization of production: an Input–Output perspective. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 23: 67–86.
Библиографическая ссылка Jensen, R. C. and West, G. R. 1980. The effect of relative coefficient size on input–output multipliers. Environment and Planning, 6: 659–670.
Библиографическая ссылка Jensen, R. C., Hewings, G. J. D. and West, G. R. 1987. On a taxonomy of economies. The Australian Journal of Regional Studies, 2: 3–24.
Библиографическая ссылка Jensen, R. C., West, G. R., Hewings, G. J. D. and onis, M. 1988. The study of regional economic structure using input–output tables. Regional Studies, 3: 209–220.
Библиографическая ссылка Lantner, R. 1974. Théorie de la dominance economique, Paris: Dunod.
Библиографическая ссылка Leontief, W. 1953. Studies in the Structure of the American Economy, New York: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Leontief, W. 1963. The structure of development. Scientific American, 209: 148–166.
Библиографическая ссылка van der Linden, J. A. and Oosterhaven, J. 1995. EC intercountry input–output relations: construction method and main results for 1965–1985. Economic Systems Research, 7: 249–269.
Библиографическая ссылка Metzler, L. A. 1951a. A multiple-country theory of income transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 1: 14–19.
Библиографическая ссылка Metzler, L. A. 1951b. Taxes and subsidies in Leontief s input–output model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 3: 433–438.
Библиографическая ссылка Pyatt, G. and Round, J. I. 1979. Accounting and fixed price multipliers in a social accounting matrix framework. Economic Journal, 89: 850–873.
Библиографическая ссылка Round, J. I. 1985. Decomposing multipliers for economic systems involving regional and world trade. Economic Journal, 95: 383–399.
Библиографическая ссылка Santhanam, K. V. and Patil, R. H. 1972. A study of the production structure of the Indian economy: an international comparison. Econometrica, 1: 159–176.
Библиографическая ссылка Schnabl, H. 1994. The evolution of production structures, analyzed by a multi-layer procedure. Economic Systems Research, 1: 51–68.
Библиографическая ссылка Sherman, J. and Morrison, W. 1950. Adjustment of an inverse matrix corresponding to a change in one element of a given matrix. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 21: 124–127.
Библиографическая ссылка Simpson, D. and Tsukui, J. 1965. The fundamental structure of input–output tables: an international comparison. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 4: 434–446.
Библиографическая ссылка Song, B.-K. 1977. The production structure of the Korean economy: international and historical comparisons. Econometrica, 1: 147–162.
Библиографическая ссылка Sonis, M. and Hewings, G. J. D. 1989. “Error and sensitivity input–output analysis: a new approach”. In Frontiers of Input–Output Analysis, Edited by: Miller, R. E., Polenske, K. R. and Rose, A. Z. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Sonis, M. and Hewings, G. J. D. 1991. “Fields of influence and extended input—output analysis: a theoretical account”. In Regional Input–Output Modelling. New Developments and Interpretations, Edited by: Dewurst, J. H. Ll, Jensen, R. C. and Hewings, G. J. D. Aldershot: Avebury.
Библиографическая ссылка Sonis, M. and Hewings, G. J. D. 1992. Coefficient change in input–output models: theory and applications. Economic Systems Research, 2: 143–157.
Библиографическая ссылка Sonis, M., Oosterhaven, J. and Hewings, G. D. J. 1993. Spatial economic structure and structural changes in the EC: feedback loop input–output analysis. Economic Systems Research, 2: 173–184.
Библиографическая ссылка Sonis, M., Hewings, G. J. D. and Lee, J. K. 1994. Interpreting spatial economic structure and spatial multipliers: three perspectives. Geographical Analysis, 2: 123–151.
Библиографическая ссылка Strassert, G. 1968–69. Zur Bestimmung strategischer Sektoren mit Hilfe von Input–Output- Modellen. Jahrbucher fur Nationalokonomie und Statistik, 182: 211–215.
Библиографическая ссылка Watanabe, T. 1961. A test of the constancy of input–output coefficients among countries. International Economic Review, 2: 340–350.
Библиографическая ссылка Watanabe, T. 1964. An experimental comparison of the production structures: EEC countries and Japan. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 2: 409–426.
Библиографическая ссылка West, G. R. 1981. An efficient approach to the estimation of regional input–output multipliers. Environment and Planning A, 13: 857–867.
Библиографическая ссылка West, G. R. 1982. Sensitivity and key sector analysis in input–output models. Australian Economic Papers, 21: 365–377.

Скрыть метаданые