| Автор | Arvanitis, Spyros |
| Автор | Hollenstein, Heinz |
| Дата выпуска | 1994 |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | OPA (Overseas Publishers Association) |
| Копирайт | Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
| Тема | Innovation behaviour of firms |
| Тема | supply vs. demand factors |
| Тема | appropriability |
| Тема | technological opportunity |
| Тема | several types of innovation indicators |
| Тема | qualitative response models |
| Название | Demand And Supply Factors In Explaining The Innovative Activity Of Swiss Manufacturing Firms |
| Тип | research-article |
| DOI | 10.1080/10438599400000001 |
| Electronic ISSN | 1476-8364 |
| Print ISSN | 1043-8599 |
| Журнал | Economics of Innovation and New Technology |
| Том | 3 |
| Первая страница | 15 |
| Последняя страница | 30 |
| Аффилиация | Arvanitis, Spyros; Center for the Research of Economic Activity, Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich |
| Аффилиация | Hollenstein, Heinz; Center for the Research of Economic Activity, Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich |
| Выпуск | 1 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Acs, Z.J. and Audretsch, D.B. 1988. Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review, 78: 679–690. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Bosworth, D. and Westaway, T. 1984. The Influence of Demand and Supply Side Pressures on the Quantity and Quality of Inventive Activity. Applied Economics, 16: 131–146. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Cohen, W. M. and Levin, R. C. 1989. “Empirical Studies of Innovation and Market Structure”. In Handbook of Industrial Organization, Edited by: Schmalensee, R and Willig, R. D. London: North Holland. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Cohen, W. M., Levin, R. C. and Mowery, D. 1987. Firm Size and R&D Intensity: A Reexamination, Journal of lndustrial Economics, 35: 543–565. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal D, A. 1989. Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D, Economic Journal, 99: 569–596. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Dasgupta, P. 1986. “The Theory of Technological Competition”. In New Developments in the Ano1ysis of Market Structure, Edited by: Stiglitz, J. E. and Mathewson, G. F. MIT Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Dasgupta, P. and Stiglitz, J. E. 1980. Industrial Structure and the Nature of Economic Activity, Economic Journal, 90: 266–293. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Dosi, G. 1988. Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation, Journal of Economic Literature, 26: 1120–1171. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Ergas, H. 1987. “The Importance of Technology Policy”. In Economic Policy and Technological Performance Edited by: Dasgupta, P. and Stoneman, P. Cambridge |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Eurostat. 1992. Proposed Questions for the Harmonized Innovations Surveys. Final Version, Luxemburg, July |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Griliches, Z., Hall, B. H. and Pakes, A. 1991. R&D, Patents, and Market Value Revisited: Is There a Second (Technological Opportunity) Factor?, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 1: 183–201. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Hotz-Hart, B. and Kuechler, C. 1992. Teehnologieportfolio und Wettbewerbsfähigkeit des Industriestandorts Schweiz. Eine Palentanalyse. Studienreihe Strukturberichterstattung, hrsg. vom Bundesamt für Konjunkturfragen, Bern. Jaffe, A. B. (1988) Demand and Supply Influences in R&D Intensity and Productivity Growth, Review of Economics and Statistics, 70: 431–437. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Jaffe, A. B. 1989. Characterizing the ‘Technological Position’ of Firms, with Application to Quantifying Technological Opportunity and Research Spillovers, Research Policy, 18: 87–97. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Kleinknecht, A. and Verspagen, B. 1990. Demand and Innovation: Schmookler Re-examined, Research Policy, 19: 387–394. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Kraft, K. 1990. Are Product- and Process-Innovations Independent of Each Other?, Applied Economics, 22: 1029–1038. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Levin, R. C, Cohen, W. M. and Mowery, D. C. R&D Appropriability, Opportunity, and Market Structure: New Evidence on Some Schumpeterian Hypotheses. American Economic Review, Papers & Proceedings. pp.20–24. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Levin, R. C., Klevorick, A. K., Nelson, R. R. and Winter S, G. 1987. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activiry, 3: 783–831. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Levin, R. C. and Reiss, P. C. 1988. Cost-reducing and Demand-creating R&D with Spillovers, Rand Journal of Economics, 19: 538–556. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Nelson, R. R. 1987. Understanding Technical Change as an Evolutionary Process, Amsterdam: North Holland. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | OECD. 1992. Principes directeurs proposés par I'OCDE pour le recueil et I’ interprétation des données sur l'innovation technologique (Manuel d'Oslo) Paris |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Phillips, A. 1966. Patents, Competition, and Technical Progress. American Economic Review, 56: 301–310. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Rosenberg, N. 1976. Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Scherer, F. M. 1982. Demand-pull and Technological Invention: Schmookler Revisited. Journal of Industrial Economics, 30: 225–237. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Schmalholz, H. und Scholz and L. 1985. Innovation in der Industrie. Struktur und Entwicklung der Innovationsaktivitäten 1979–1982. Ifo-Studien zur Industriewirtschaft, 28 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Growth. Schurnpeterian Perspectives, Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Stoneman, P. 1983. The Economic Analysis of Technological Change, Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Zimmermann, K. F. 1989. Innovative Activity and Industrial Structure. Empirica, 16: 85–110. |
