Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Patel, Parimal
Автор Pavitt, Keith
Дата выпуска 1994
dc.description We shall argue that the notion of ‘national systems of innovation’ is a useful one, since it treats explicitly what was ignored in earlier models of technical change: namely, deliberate ‘intangible’ investment in technological learning activities that involve a variety of institutions (principally business firms, universities, other education and training institutions, and governments), links amongst them and associated incentive structures and competencies. Considerable diversity–indeed divergence–exists amongst OECD countries in the level and sectoral pattern of business investments in technological learning, and in the quality of support structures in basic research and workforce skills. Some of this international ‘diversity’ is not economically and socially desirable: in particular, persistently low investment in business R & D and related technological activitics, and in associated workforce skills, which help determine both long-term economic growth rates, and the level of national demand for basic research and associated training activities. Other elements of international ‘diversity’ can be seen as inevitable or desirable: in particular, differing national patterns of technological specialisation that reflect cumulative and localised paths of technological learning, and that strongly influence patterns of structural change and comparative advantage in trade.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель OPA (Overseas Publishers Association)
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема Innovation
Тема national systems
Тема technological learning
Название National Innovation Systems: Why They Are Important, And How They Might Be Measured And Compared
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/10438599400000004
Electronic ISSN 1476-8364
Print ISSN 1043-8599
Журнал Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Том 3
Первая страница 77
Последняя страница 95
Аффилиация Patel, Parimal; Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex
Аффилиация Pavitt, Keith; Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex
Выпуск 1
Библиографическая ссылка Abernathy, W. and Hayes, R. 1980. Managing our Way to Economic Decline, Harvard Business Review, July/August
Библиографическая ссылка Archibugi, D. and Pianta, M. 1992. The Technological Specialisation of Advanced Countries, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Библиографическая ссылка Arrow, K. 1962a. The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29: 155–173.
Библиографическая ссылка Arrow, K. 1962b. “Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention”. In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity, Edited by: Nelson, R. Princeton UP: New Jersey.
Библиографическая ссылка Bell, M. and Pavitt, K. 1993. Technological Accumulation and Industrial Growth: Contrasts between Developed and Developing Countries, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2: 157–210.
Библиографическая ссылка Bertin, G. and Wyatt, S. 1988. Multinationals and Industrial Property, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
Библиографическая ссылка Cantwell, J. 1989. Technological Innovation and Multinational Corporations, Oxford: Blackwell.
Библиографическая ссылка Corbett, J. and Mayer, C. 1991. Financial Reform in Eastern Europe Discussion paper No. 603. Centre for Economic Policy Research, London: CEPR.
Библиографическая ссылка David, P. 1975. “Innovation and Economic Growth”. In Technical Choice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Dosi, G., Pavitt, K. and Soete, L. 1990. The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade, Wheatsheaf.
Библиографическая ссылка Fagerberg, J. 1987. “A Technology Gap Approach to Why Growth Rates Differ”. In Output Measurement in Science and Technology: Essays in Honour of Y. Fabian, Edited by: Freeman, C. Amsterdam: North Holland.
Библиографическая ссылка Fagerberg, J. 1988. International Competitiveness, Economic Jounlal, 98: 355—374
Библиографическая ссылка Franko, L. 1989. Global Corporate Competition: who's winning, who's losing, and the R & D factor as one reason why. Strategic Management Journal, 10: 449–474.
Библиографическая ссылка Freeman, C. 1987. Output Measurement in Science and Technology: Essays in Honour of Y. Fabian, Nonh-Holland: Amsterdam.
Библиографическая ссылка Freeman, C. 1988. “Japan: a New National System of Innovation”. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, Edited by: Dosi, G, Freeman, C, Nelson, R, Silverberg, G and Soete, L. London: Pinter.
Библиографическая ссылка Geroski, P., Machin, S. and van Reenen, J. 1993. The Profitability of Innovating Firms. RAND Journal of Economics, 24: 198–211.
Библиографическая ссылка Grilliches, Z. 1990. Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661–1707.
Библиографическая ссылка Guerrieri, P. 1991. Technology and International Trade Performance of the Most Advanced Countries, BRIE Working papers, Berkeley: University of California.
Библиографическая ссылка Hanson, P. and Pavitt, K. 1987. The Comparative Economics of Research, Development and Innovation in East and West: A Survey.
Библиографическая ссылка Hu, Y-S. 1975. National Attitudes and the Financing of Industry, Political and Economic Planning, Vol. XLI, London: Broadsheet No. 559.
Библиографическая ссылка Irvine, J., Martin, B. and Isard, P. 1990. Investing in the Future, Elgar: Aldershot.
Библиографическая ссылка Jaffe, A. 1989. Real Effects of Academic Research. American Economic Review, 79: 957–970.
Библиографическая ссылка Kline, S. 1990. A Numerical Measure for the Complexity of Systems the Concept and Some Implications, Report INN-5: Dept of mechanical engineering.
Библиографическая ссылка Lawrence, P. 1980. Managers and Management in W. Germany, London: Croom Helm.
Библиографическая ссылка Levin, R., Klevorick, A., Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1987. Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 3: 783–820.
Библиографическая ссылка Lundvall, B-A. 1988. “lnnovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation”. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, Edited by: Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G. and Soete, L. London: Pinter.
Библиографическая ссылка Maizels, A. 1963. Industrial Growth and World Trade, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Mansfield, E., Schwartz, M. and Wagner, S. 1981. Imitation Costs and Patents: an Empirical Study. Economic Journal, 91: 907–918.
Библиографическая ссылка Martin, B. 1992. The Position of British Science. Nature, 355: 760
Библиографическая ссылка Mason, G., Prais, S. and van Ark, B. 1992. Vocational Educatiori and Productivity. the Netherlands and Britain, National Institute Economic Review, May: 46–63.
Библиографическая ссылка Mitchell, G. and Hamilton, W. 1988. Managing R & D as a Strategic Option. Research-Technology Management, 31: 15–22.
Библиографическая ссылка Mowery, D. and Rosenberg, N. 1979. The Influence of Market Demand upon Innovation: a Critical Review of Some Recent Empirical Studies. Research Policy, 8: 102–153.
Библиографическая ссылка Myers, S. 1984. Finance Theory and Finance Strategy. Interfaces, 14: 126–137.
Библиографическая ссылка Nelson, R. 1990. US Technological Leadership: where did it come from and where did it go. Research Policy, 19: 117–132.
Библиографическая ссылка Nelson, R. 1990. Capitalism as an Engine of Progress, Research Policy., 19: 193
Библиографическая ссылка Nelson, R. 1993. National Innovation Systems: a Comparative Analysis, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Nelson, R. and Winter, S. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Econornic Change. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Observatoire des Sciences et des Techniques. 1991. “Science et Technologie: Indicateurs”. In Economica Paris
Библиографическая ссылка Patel, P. 1994. Localised Production of Technology for Global Markets. Cambridge Journal of Economics, forthcoming
Библиографическая ссылка Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1991. Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: an Important Case of Non-Globalisation, Journal of International Business Studies, 22: 1—21
Библиографическая ссылка Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1991. Europe's Technological Performance, Edited by: Freeman, C., Sharp, M. and Walker, W. Pinter, London: Technology in Europe's Future.
Библиографическая ссылка Patel, P. and Pavitt, K. 1994. “Patterns of Technological Activity: their Measurement and Interpretation”. In The Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Edited by: Stoneman, P. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. forthcoming
Библиографическая ссылка Pavitt, K. 1991. What makes Basic Research Economically Useful, Research Policy, 20: 109–119.
Библиографическая ссылка Pavitt, K. and Patel, P. 1988. The International Distribution and Determinants of Technological Activities, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 4: 35–55.
Библиографическая ссылка Porter, M. 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations, London: Macmillan.
Библиографическая ссылка Posner, M. 1961. International Trade and Technical Change, Oxford Economic Papers, 13: 323–341.
Библиографическая ссылка Prais, S. 1993. “Economic Performance and Education: the Nature of Britain's Deficiencies”. In Discussion Paper no. 52. National Institute for Economic and Social Research London
Библиографическая ссылка van Raan, A. 1988. Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Библиографическая ссылка Ray, G. 1989. Full Circle: The Diffusion of Technology, Research Policy, 18: 1–18.
Библиографическая ссылка Romer, P. 1990. Endogenous Technical Change, Journal of Political Economy, 98: 71–102.
Библиографическая ссылка Rosenberg, N. 1976. “Science, Invention and Economic Growth”. In Perspectives on Technology, 84Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Originally published in Economic Journal
Библиографическая ссылка Rosenberg, N. and Nelson, R. 1992. American Universities and Technical Advance in Industry, Centre for Economic Policy Research: Stanford University.
Библиографическая ссылка Salter, W. 1966. Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Schmookler, J. 1966. Invention and Economic Growth, Boston: Mass: Harvard UP.
Библиографическая ссылка 1990. Four Fields where Japan leads and US lags, 1 February
Библиографическая ссылка Science Watch. World Standings in Science Vol. 2, February, 1991
Библиографическая ссылка Sharp, M. Europe: a Renaissance?, Science and Public Policy, 18393–400.
Библиографическая ссылка Soete, L. 1981. A General Test of Technological Gap Trade Theory, Weltwirtschafrliches Archiv., 117: 638–666.
Библиографическая ссылка Soete, L. and Verspagen, B. 1993. “Technology and Growth: the Complex Dynamics of Catching Up, and Taking Over”. In Explaining Economic Growth, Edited by: Szirmai, A., van Ark, B. and Pilat, D. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Библиографическая ссылка Stiglitz, J. 1987. “Learning to learn, localised learning and technological progress”. In Economic Policy and Technological Performance, Edited by: Dasgupta, P. and Stoneman, P. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Vernon, R. 1966. International Investment and International Trade in the Product Cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 190–207.
Библиографическая ссылка Vernon, R. 1979. The Product Cycle Hypothesis in a New International Environment, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 41: 255–267.
Библиографическая ссылка Walsh, V. 1984. Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry: Demand-Pull or Discovery-Push? Research Policy, 13: 211–234.

Скрыть метаданые