Мобильная версия

Доступно журналов:

3 288

Доступно статей:

3 891 637

 

Скрыть метаданые

Автор Meijers, Huub H.M.
Дата выпуска 1994
dc.description This paper presents a simple vintage model that incorporates the idea of the diffusion of new technologies. As a first attempt we use a macro-economic inspired distribution of technologies which are embodied in new equipment. The speed of diffusion depends on expected profits and on accumulated knowledge. The choice of the initial labour intensity stems from the behaviour of firms, however. From our estimation results on Dutch data for the enterprise sector it appears that the speed of diffusion has an impact on the average labour productivity of newly installed equipment such that the productivity paradox can be explained. Due to a decrease in the speed of diffusion in the late seventies and eighties, the growth of the average labour productivity declines whereas the labour productivity growth of the most advanced technologies proves to be stationary during the estimation period from 1960 to 1988.
Формат application.pdf
Издатель OPA (Overseas Publishers Association)
Копирайт Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC
Тема Productivity slowdown
Тема diffusion of new technologies
Тема vintage models
Название On the Slowdown of Productivity Growth in the Netherlands 1960–1988: A Macro Economic Vintage Diffusion Approach
Тип research-article
DOI 10.1080/10438599400000007
Electronic ISSN 1476-8364
Print ISSN 1043-8599
Журнал Economics of Innovation and New Technology
Том 3
Первая страница 99
Последняя страница 122
Аффилиация Meijers, Huub H.M.; Maastricht Economic Research Institute on Innovation and Technology, State University of Limburg
Выпуск 2
Библиографическая ссылка Gelauff, G.M.M., Wennekers, A.R.M. and de Jong, A.H.M. 1985. A Putty-Clay Model with Three Factors of Production and Partly Endogenous Technical Progress, De Economist, 133(3): 327–351.
Библиографическая ссылка Gregory, R.G. and James, D.W. 1973. Do New Factories Embody Best Practice Technology?. Economic Journal, 83: 1133–1155.
Библиографическая ссылка Griliches, S. 1957. Hybrid corn: an Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change. Econometrica, 25(4): 501–522.
Библиографическая ссылка Hartog, H. den. 1984. Empirical Vintage Models for the Netherlands: A Review in Outline. De Economist, 132(3): 326–349.
Библиографическая ссылка Hulten, C.R. 1992. Growth Accounting When Technical Change is Embodied in Capital. American Economic Review, 82(4): 964–980.
Библиографическая ссылка Johansen, L. 1959. Substitution versus Fixed Production Coefficients in the Theory of Economic Growth: A Synthesis. Review of Economics and Statistics, 27: 157–176.
Библиографическая ссылка Kon, Y. 1983. Capital Input Choice under Price Uncertainty: A Putty-Clay Technology Case. International Economic Review, 24(1): 183–197.
Библиографическая ссылка Kuipers, S.K. and van Zon, A.H. 1982. Output and Employment Growth in the Netherlands in the Postwar Period: A Putty-Clay Approach, De Economist, 130(1): 38–70.
Библиографическая ссылка Mansfield, E. 1961. Technical change and the rate of imitation. Econometrica, 29(4): 741–766.
Библиографическая ссылка Meijers, H.H.M. 1992. “On the slowdown of productivity growth in the Netherlands 1960–1988: a macro economic vintage diffusion approach”. In MERIT research memorandum RM 19–003 Maastricht
Библиографическая ссылка Metcalfe, J.S. 1988. “The diffusion of’ Innovation: An Interpretative Study”. In Technical Change and Economic Theory, Edited by: Dosi, G.C.H., Freeman, R., Nelson, G., Silverberg and Soete, L. 560–589. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
Библиографическая ссылка Moene, K.O. 1985a. Shopping for an Investment Good. International Economic Review, 26(2 pp): 351–363.
Библиографическая ссылка Moene, K.O. 1985b. “Fluctuations and factor Proportions: Putty-Clay Investment under Uncertainty”. In Production, Multi-Sectoral Growth and Planning, Edited by: Hoel, M. and Longva, S. 87–108. Elsevier Science Publishers. North-Holland
Библиографическая ссылка Muysken, J. and van Zon, A.H. 1987. Employment and Unemployment in the Netherlands, 1960–1984:. A Putty-Clay Approach, Recherches Economiques de Louvain, 53(2): 101–133.
Библиографическая ссылка Phelps, E.S. 1962. The New View of Investment: A Neoclassical Analysis. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 76: 548–567.
Библиографическая ссылка Romeo, A.A. 1977. The Rate of Imitation of a Capital-Embodied Process Innovation. Economica, 44: 63–69.
Библиографическая ссылка Salter, W.E.G. 1960. Productivity and Technical Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Soete, L. and Turner, R. 1984. Technology Diffusion and the Rate of Technical Change. The Economic Journal, 94: 612–623.
Библиографическая ссылка Solow, R.M. 1957. Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function. Review of Economics and Statistics, 39: 312–330.
Библиографическая ссылка Solow, R.M. 1960. “Investment and Technical Progress”. In Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, Edited by: Arrow, K, Karlin, S. and Suppes, P. 89–104. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Библиографическая ссылка Stoneman, PL. 1991. “Technological Diffusion: The Viewpoint of Economic Theory”. In Innovation and Technology in Europe, Edited by: Mathias, P. and Davis, J.A. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Библиографическая ссылка Thirtle, C.G. and Ruttan, V.W. 1987. “The role of demand and supply in the generation and diffusion of technical change”. Chur: Harwood Academic Publishers.

Скрыть метаданые