Автор |
Wyckoff, Andrew W. |
Дата выпуска |
1995 |
dc.description |
This paper analyses the international comparability of methods used to convert the value added of the office and computing machinery sector (OCM) into constant prices for nine OECD countries. It concludes that the variations which exist in the price indexes are largely due to differences in the methods countries use to capture changes in the quality of an industry's output over time. The paper evaluates the impact of these different OCM price indexes on the growth rate of labour productivity during the 1980s by conducting a sensitivity test where the US OCM index is substituted for each of the individual country indexes. This experiment causes the OCM labour productivity growth rate to change by over a factor of ten for several countries. This result suggests that international comparisons of labour productivity should not be made for the OCM sector using the official data, and that labour productivity comparisons of sectors OCM belongs to—non-electrical machinery and fabricated metal products and machinery—should be conducted cautiously, if at all. |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
OPA (Overseas Publishers Association) |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Тема |
Hedonic price indexes |
Тема |
labour productivity |
Тема |
office & computer equipment J.E.L. Classification Codes: |
Тема |
L63—Computers |
Тема |
O47—Aggregate Productivity |
Тема |
O57—Comparative Studies of Countries |
Название |
The Impact Of Computer Prices On International Comparisons Of Labour Productivity |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/10438599500000007 |
Electronic ISSN |
1476-8364 |
Print ISSN |
1043-8599 |
Журнал |
Economics of Innovation and New Technology |
Том |
3 |
Первая страница |
277 |
Последняя страница |
293 |
Аффилиация |
Wyckoff, Andrew W.; <sup>a</sup> Industry, Telecommunications, US Senate Washington, DC, 20510Commerce Program Office of Technology Assessment |
Выпуск |
3-4 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Cartwright, D., Won, G. and Wasshausen, D. “Improved Deflators and Price Indexes for Computers and Peripheral Equipment”. In Survey of Current Business (forthcoming) Table 4 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Denison, E. 1989. Estimates of Productivity Change by Industry, Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Dulberger, E. 1989. “The Application of an Hedonic Model to a Quality Adjusted Price Index for Computer Processors”. In Table 8 as cited by Triplett in the same volume, Edited by: and Capital, Technology, Jorgenson, D. and Landau, R. Cambridge, MA: Pressx. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Eurostat, Imf, Oecd, UN and World Bank. Price and Volume Measures New York Chapter XVI (forthcoming) |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Flamm, K. Globalization in the Computer Industry. paper presented at OECD Conference on Globalization of the Computer Industry. Paris |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Gordon, R.J. and Baily, M.N. 1991. “Measurement Issues and the Productivity Slowdown in Five major Industrial Countries”. In Technology and Productivify, 187–205. Paris: OECD. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Hill, P. 1987. Recent Developments in Index Number Theory and Practice. OECD Economic Studies, : 124–148. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lawrence, R. 1990. US Current Account Adjustment: An Appraisal. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, : 343–392. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lawrence, R. How Open is Japan?. paper presented at MIT Conference on the United States and Japan: Trade and Investment. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Meade, E. 1991. “Computers and the Trade Deficit,' International Economic Transactions”. In NBER Studies in Income and Wealth, Edited by: Peter, Hooper and David Richardson, J. University of Chicago Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Moreau, A. 1991. Microinformatique: Concurrence par les Prix. INSEE Premiere, December |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Neef, A. An International Comparison of Manufacturing Productivity and Unit Labor Cost Trends. paper presented at the Social Science Research Council Conference on International Productivity and Competitiveness, Palo Alto California. pp.15 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Nordhaus, W. in Baily and Gordon, M.R. 1988. The Productivity Slowdown, Measurement Issues and the Explosion of Computer Power. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, |
Библиографическая ссылка |
OECD. 1992. “The OECD STAN Database for Industrial Analysis”. In OECD Document Series Paris |
Библиографическая ссылка |
OECD. 1993. Industrial Structure Statistics 1991 Paris |
Библиографическая ссылка |
OECD. 1993a. “Intra-firm Trade”. In Trade Policy Issues Paris |
Библиографическая ссылка |
OECD. “Sector Case Study of Globalisation in the Computer Industry”. In Case Studies of Globalisation in Industries in OECD Countries forthcoming |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Stoneman, P. and Francis, N. Double Deflation and the Measurement of Output and Productivity in UK Manufacturing 1979–1989. presented at a meeting of the ESRC Industrial Economics Study Group at The London Business School in November 1992. mimeo revised December 1992 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Trajtenberg, M. 1991. “Quality Adjusted Price Indices and the Measurement of Economic Growth”. In Technology and Productivity, 219–227. Paris: OECD. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Triplett, J. 1986. The Economic Interpretation of Hedonic Methods. Survey of Current Business, January: 36–50. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Triplett, J. 1989. “Price and Technological Change in a Capital Good: A Survey of Research on Computers”. Edited by: Jorgenson, D. and Landau, R. 127–224. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Van Ark, B. and Pilat, D. 1993. Productivity Levels in Germany, Japan, and the United States: Differences and Causes. Brookings Papers: Microeconomics 2, : 1–69. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Young, A. 1989. BEA's Measurement of Computer Output. Survey of Current Business, July: 108–115. |