A Paradox for Weak Deontology
HUEMER, MICHAEL; HUEMER MICHAEL; University of Colorado
Журнал:
Utilitas
Дата:
2009
Аннотация:
Deontological ethicists generally agree that there is a way of harming others such that it is wrong to harm others in that way for the sake of producing a comparable but greater benefit for others. Given plausible assumptions, this principle leads to the possibility of paradoxical cases in which each of two actions is wrong, yet the combination of both actions is permissible. Consequentialism provides the most natural solution of the puzzle.
119.8Кб