| Автор | Comm, Clare L. |
| Автор | Mathaisel, Dennis F. X. |
| Дата выпуска | 1998 |
| dc.description | ABSTRACTIn some industries, workers may evaluate their bosses. This is often used as one of several methods to ascertain the administrative ability of the manager. However, in the majority of business schools across the country, student evaluations of faculty are the most frequently used method of evaluating teaching effectiveness. Does this practice encourage business school faculty to teach their students with future employers in mind, or does it encourage faculty to teach with their own student evaluations in mind? The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of student course evaluation instruments by colleges and universities accredited by the American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB). |
| Формат | application.pdf |
| Издатель | Taylor & Francis Group |
| Копирайт | Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
| Название | Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness in America's Business Schools: Implications for Service Marketers |
| Тип | research-article |
| DOI | 10.1300/J090v16n02_09 |
| Print ISSN | 0748-4623 |
| Журнал | Journal of Professional Services Marketing |
| Том | 16 |
| Первая страница | 163 |
| Последняя страница | 170 |
| Аффилиация | Comm, Clare L.; University of Massachusetts Lowell |
| Аффилиация | Mathaisel, Dennis F. X.; Babson College |
| Выпуск | 2 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Cashin, W. E. 1988. “Student Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of the Research Center for Faculty Evaluation and Development, Division of Continuing Education, Kansas State University. unpublished manuscript, IDEA Paper No. 20 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Divoky, J. J. and Rothermel, M. A. 1989. “Patterns in Student Preferences for Teaching Behaviors,”. In Proceedings of the 1989 Annual Meeting of the Decision Sciences Institute 469–471. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Dwyer, F. W. 1973. “Selected Criteria for Evaluating Teaching Effectiveness,”. In Improving College and University Teaching Winter 51–52. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Dwyer, William C. 1996. Student Evaluations: The Final Form. The NEA Higher Education Journal, XII(Number 1): 141–146. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Honan, W. H. 1994. New Pressures on the University,” Education Life Section. The New York Times, January 9 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Marsh, Herbert W. 1991. Multidimensional Students' Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness: a Test of Alternative Higher-Order Structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(No. 2): 285–296. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Mesak, H. and Jauch, L. 1991. Faculty Performance Evaluation: Modeling to Improve Personnel Decisions. Decision Sciences, 22(No. 5): 1142–1157. November/December |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Quinlan, Kathleen M. 1995. Faculty Perspectives on Peer Review. The NEA Higher Education Journal, XI(No. 2) |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Seldin, P. 1980. Successful Faculty Evaluation Programs Crugers: Coventry.. |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Shelton, William and DeZure, Deborah. 1993. Fostering a Teaching Culture in Higher Education. The NEA Higher Education Journal, VIII(No. 2) |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Watkins, B. 1990. New Techniques Tested to Evaluate College Teaching. Chronicle of Higher Education, A15-A16 |
| Библиографическая ссылка | Zeithaml, Valarie and Bitner, Mary Joe. 1996. Services Marketing New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.. |
