Автор |
Ornatowski, Cezar M. |
Дата выпуска |
1992 |
dc.description |
Traditional textbook rationales for the technical writing course locate the essence of technical writing in objectivity, clarity, and neutrality, and the need for teaching it in its usefulness to employers. Such rationales, however, are unable to accommodate a notion of ethics and responsibility: if the writer merely serves the interests that employ her by reporting facts in an objective way, how can she exercise choice when ethical problems arise? An alternative view is to see technical writing as always rhetorical and involved with potentially conflicting agendas and interests, with objectivity, clarity, and neutrality serving merely as stylistic devices in the writer's rhetorical toolbox. Technical writers are rhetoricians who continually make ethical choices in serving diverse interests and negotiating between conflicting demands. The recognition of the fundamental rhetoricity of technical writing is the first step towards accommodating a meaningful notion of ethics into the technical writing curriculum. |
Формат |
application.pdf |
Издатель |
Taylor & Francis Group |
Копирайт |
Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC |
Название |
Between efficiency and politics rhetoric and ethics in technical writing |
Тип |
research-article |
DOI |
10.1080/10572259209359493 |
Electronic ISSN |
1542-7625 |
Print ISSN |
1057-2252 |
Журнал |
Technical Communication Quarterly |
Том |
1 |
Первая страница |
91 |
Последняя страница |
103 |
Аффилиация |
Ornatowski, Cezar M.; Assistant professor of rhetoric and technical communication, San Diego State University |
Выпуск |
1 |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Anderson, Paul V. 1989. Technical Writing: A Reader‐Centered Approach. , 2nd ed., New York: Harcourt. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Dobrin, David N. 1985. “What's the Purpose of Teaching Technical Communication.”. The Technical Writing Teacher, 7: 146–76. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Farrell, Thomas B. and Goodnight, G. Thomas. 1981. “Accidental Rhetoric: The Root Metaphors of Three Mile Island.”. Communication Monographs, 48: 271–300. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Lannon, John M. 1988. Technical Writing. , 4th ed., Glenview: Scott. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Layton, Edwin Jr. 1971. The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession., Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Miller, Carolyn R. 1989. “What's Practical About Technical Writing?”. In Technical Writing: Theory and Practice., Edited by: Fearing, Bertie E. and Sparrow, W. Keats. 14–26. New York: MLA. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Mirel, Barbara. 1988. “The Politics of Usability: The Organizational Functions of an In‐House Manual.”. In Effective Documentation: What We Have Learned from Research., Edited by: Doheny‐Farina, Stephen. 277–298. Cambridge: MIT P. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Pauley, Steven E. and Riordan, Daniel G. 1990. Technical Report Writing Today. , 4th ed., Boston: Houghton. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Ritti, R. Richard. 1986. “The Social Basis of Organizational Knowledge.”. In Organization—Communication: Emerging Perspectives., Edited by: Thayer, Lee. Vol. 1, 102–132. Norwood: Ablex. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Southard, Sherry G. 1990. “Interacting Successfully in Corporate Culture.”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4: 79–90. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Trimbur, John. 1989. “Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Writing.”. College English, 51: 602–16. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Wildavsky, Aaron. 1964. The Politics of the Budgetary Process., Berkeley and Los Angeles: U of California P. |
Библиографическая ссылка |
Winsor, Dorothy. 1990. “The Construction of Knowledge in Organizations: Asking the Right Questions About the Challenger.”. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 4: 7–20. |